DataLabel Date Time Log Entry
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-001 2010-12-07 05:42:02 Note that almost all frames in this observation have pattern noise, some worse than others. I've noted a few of the particularly bad frames -MD residual image from acquisition
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-002 2010-12-07 05:44:36 ~4 cts
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-003 2010-12-07 05:47:08 Fairly high pattern noise, ~15-20 peak to peak. USABLE - MD
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-004 2010-12-07 05:49:42 ~5.3
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-005 2010-12-07 05:52:15 Some noise, not as bad - MD
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-006 2010-12-07 05:54:47 ~4.9
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-012 2010-12-07 06:10:04 ~4.5
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-014 2010-12-07 06:15:10 ~4.6
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-016 2010-12-07 06:20:15 ~4.5
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-018 2010-12-07 06:25:41 ~4.5
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-020 2010-12-07 06:30:47 paused to recenter
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-021 2010-12-07 06:57:10 ~4.5 Very bad pattern noise, ~100 peak to peak in upper left quadrant - MD
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-023 2010-12-07 07:02:15 ~4.5
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-025 2010-12-07 07:07:20 ~4.7
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-026 2010-12-07 07:09:53 Bad pattern noise, ~65 counts peak to peak - MD
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-027 2010-12-07 07:12:26 ~4.2
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-029 2010-12-07 07:17:32 ~3.9
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-035 2010-12-07 07:31:37 reduced exposure time because k and H are saturated
GN-2010B-Q-41-69-053 2010-12-07 07:36:21 Rest of these flats are saturated. Good flats are images 210-217 (0.3s, 1 coadd) - MD