DataLabel | Date Time | Log Entry |
---|---|---|
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-001 | 2010-04-11 11:02:04 | halfway through the exposure, which had started in excellent IQ, the seeing suddenly turned awful (~2 arcsec) and did not recover. We tried to wait and see if conditions would improve but eventuallly decided to abandon. |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-002 | 2010-04-11 11:37:25 | flat |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-004 | 2010-04-11 12:40:47 | flat |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-005 | 2010-04-11 12:42:14 | flat |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-006 | 2010-04-11 12:43:51 | seeing degraded a bit during the last 5 minutes of this exposure |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-007 | 2010-04-11 13:19:17 | seeing recovered nicely, then degraded again during the last 4 minutes. |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-008 | 2010-04-11 13:54:39 | flat |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-009 | 2010-04-11 13:56:07 | flat |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-010 | 2010-04-11 13:57:44 | seeing started out poor and stayed that way. Image read out after 12 minutes, replacement exposure and flat added to sequence, conditions monitored until seeing improved again. |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-011 | 2010-04-11 14:15:02 | seeing nice, just a small bubble lasting 2-3 minutes. This exposure has ANODCNT=31 and BNODCNT=29, it is likely that the exposure started with the shuffle position for nod A instead of nod B. The data reduction software will attempt to compensate for this when doing the sky subtraction. |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-013 | 2010-04-12 13:54:23 | flat |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-014 | 2010-04-12 13:55:51 | flat |
GN-2010A-Q-1-37-015 | 2010-04-12 13:57:27 | seeing a bit variable in the last 15 minutes (especially the last 5 minutes) but still ok I believe. Kathy |