DataLabel | Date Time | Log Entry |
---|---|---|
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-001 | 2006-10-14 09:44:41 | elongated |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-002 | 2006-10-14 09:46:18 | elongated |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-003 | 2006-10-14 09:49:40 | round! (astigmatism had not converged in previous images) |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-004 | 2006-10-14 09:51:44 | elongated again |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-005 | 2006-10-14 09:53:40 | elongated again |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-006 | 2006-10-14 09:56:29 | rounder (increased "S" parameter) |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-007 | 2006-10-14 09:58:06 | still somewhat elongated. giving up. |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-008 | 2006-11-14 10:18:10 | FWHM = 0.39", image slightly elongated but Kevin and Rachel says this looks good. OFFSETS (arcsec): P = -1.24 Q = 3.61 file N20061114S0126.fits exists. rescued due to image abort. has usable data -aw |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-009 | 2006-11-14 10:21:04 | FWHM = 0.40", no offsets necessary. |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-010 | 2006-11-14 10:38:23 | woah, one truly bizarre looking image |
GN-2006B-DD-5-1-011 | 2006-11-14 10:40:10 | FWHM = 0.39", looks like it is where it should be. Please note that file 126 exists (we had to rescue it). It was stopped early because Michelle was integrating for five times longer than requested. As we were watching it the negative spectrum started to become stronger than the positive one. This is why we took the final acquisition image, we had expected the object to be off the slit so we are surprised it had not moved. Anyway file 126 is fine for use as a standard, Kevin will investigate the strange behavior we thought we saw. |